They just cut the bottom out of one 35mm canister, & taped it to
another, making a tall one.
Easier & cheaper than buying them.
On 6/1/2007 at 4:45 PM espressobuzz wrote:
Somewhere I saw a photo of someone's DIY 120 film canisters.
They just cut the bottom out of one 35mm canister, & taped it to
another, making a tall one.
Easier & cheaper than buying them.
> I'm still not clear on why someone would want to makeI think we have a mixing of terms.
> or buy a 120 film canister.
On 6/1/2007 at 9:28 AM John Thurston wrote:
Bob Schlesinger wrote:
> I'm still not clear on why someone would want to make
> or buy a 120 film canister.
I think we have a mixing of terms.
I have seen 120 film "canisters" that hold a single
roll of film outside the camera. It has nothing to
do with loading a canister of film into the camera.
It is just for light/air/water tight transport of the
film in your pack.
I actually carry my 120 film in a hard yellow plastic
case that keeps it neat in my pack. It holds four
rolls of film (out of their boxes but in their foil/mylar).
It isn't or air water tight for submersion but it is
certainly sufficient to keep my film safe from crushing
and rain.
--
John Thurston
Juneau Alaska
http://stereo. thurstons. us
> In my class last quarter, one of the students (who is a lover of
> very old cameras) brought in a new 120 film that actually came
> with a
> canister! I forget what brand it was -- it was not a major brand
> at all.
>
> I have seen people selling old medicine bottles (black,
> light-proof) on eBay for use as 120 film canisters.
>
On 6/1/07, espressobuzz <espressobuzz@yahoo.com> wrote:Somewhere I saw a photo of someone's DIY 120 film canisters.
They just cut the bottom out of one 35mm canister, & taped it to
another, making a tall one.
Easier & cheaper than buying them.
> Thanks for the tip but the whole point (for me) of using a
> canister, is to avoid possible leakages. A cobbled together
> canister would introduce the same variables as using paper wrap
> only. I think I'll buy mine.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MF3D-group@yahoogroups.com [mailto:MF3D-group@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of lnygren@pol.net
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 12:06 PM
> To: MF3D-group@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [MF3D-group] 120 film canister
>
> http://www.freestylephoto.biz/sc_prod.php?cat_id=&pid=6074
>
> This is the cheapest I have seen, although I didn't check their
> shipping rates. -Linda
>
> David Damico said:
> > Thanks for the tip but the whole point (for me) of using a
> > canister, is to avoid possible leakages. A cobbled together
> > canister would introduce the same variables as using paper wrap
> > only. I think I'll buy mine.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>